About

Why this site exists

Most AI advice for consultants is written by people who have never had to deliver a project alone.

The premise

A one-person consultancy has the same delivery surface as a five-person firm: research, proposals, analysis, documents, invoicing, follow-up. The only difference is that one person does all of it, and every hour spent on admin is an hour not billed.

AI is genuinely useful here, but not in the way most coverage suggests. It does not replace the consultant. It compresses the parts of the work that are structured but tedious — transcription, first drafts, reformatting, summarising a call, rebuilding the same deck skeleton for a new client.

How workflows are tested

Before a workflow is published, it goes through three checks:

  1. Run on a real task. Not a demo prompt — an actual piece of client work, or a realistic reconstruction of one.
  2. Measured. Time before, time after, and what the human still had to correct.
  3. Reproduced once more. If it only worked the first time, it is not a workflow, it is an anecdote.

Workflows that failed are still documented, with the failure mode stated plainly. A negative result is more useful than an untested recommendation.

What is not here

Current status

The site skeleton is live. The workflow library, the writing, and the contact route are still being built. Nothing on this site should be read as a product offer yet.

Open item: a contact address and a newsletter are not set up. Until they are, this page is the only way to know what the project is doing.

Back to the homepage